The “Raw article (P2 output)” field is empty, so there is no HTML to validate or repair. Please paste the P2 article and I’ll run the 14 gates and the intro and native-language checks.

Don't miss these

4 related posts

Before you do, three issues need a decision, because they would change the article’s facts:

1. **2024 match details conflict.** The research notes give Providence Stadium, Guyana, with the date reported as 6, 7 or 8 June 2024. The content plan gives 7 June 2024, “Group C,” and NZ 75-10 in 15.2 overs. The research notes say NZ were 75 all out. Gate 4 will override the HTML with the verified value, but the research gives no verified date, so the article would still carry a disputed date.
2. **Several plan claims have no source in the research notes.** These are the 2025 warm-up result (NZ by 2 wickets, 13 balls remaining), the ICC full-membership date (2017), and the 05:30 UTC start time. Under Gate 3 these must be sourced or moved to the rumor list. The 2025 warm-up is the only support for one of the four H2 questions, so I’d recommend dropping it if no source turns up.
3. **The content plan dates a 183-5 scoreline to 7 February 2026.** The verified facts date the match 8 February 2026, so the plan’s timeline entry conflicts with them.

Other items to settle:

– **Internal links:** The two supplied links (All Blacks vs France recap, Club World Cup 2025 winner) have no meaningful topical overlap with “afghanistan vs new zealand,” so Gate 6 and the internal-link relevance rule would likely drop them. Do you have cricket-specific internal URLs?
– **Publication date:** Gate 7 requires today’s ISO date for datePublished and dateModified. I don’t have today’s date, so please provide it.
– **Research confidence is low:** Gate 10 requires the rumor list to be at least as long as the confirmed list. Once the article is supplied, I’ll apply that check.